It appears that IETF -- Bastian Buck <[email protected]> said: >Since users are unlikely to switch directly to DKIM2, my proposal is to add a >PQ-secure variant to >DKIM1 as well (similar to Ed25519). I discuss the use of PQC in DKIM1, >proposals for possible >algorithms, and the implementation in this I-D: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-buck-dkim-pq-dkim1/ > >I’d be grateful for any comments or feedback.
Our plan is for DKIM2 to replace DKIM1. If people are updating their software, we want them to update it to DKIM2. Also, as the author of the Ed25519 RFC 8463 I can tell you that the number of places that have implemented it rounds to zero. We basically did it in the unlikely event that RSA was broken. Even if we added a PQ alg to DKIM1, nobody would implement that, either. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
