On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > The point that I have been arguing however is that where a protocol is > ALREADY DEFINED the charter should allow discussion of the relationship > between DKIM and the existing work.
Why don't you write a draft that specifies how DKIM should be extended in the way that you want? The hooks are there in the base spec. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
