> I don't believe that either Ned or I have been characterizing > this as busy work. The problem is that even the guide Russ > gave is ambgiuous. If I remember correctly, it was what Jim > and Eric were working from when at IETF, and they missed the > mark. As I mentioned to Steve Kent, I _suspect_ I have an > idea of what they want, but neither the bounds nor depth have > been set -- does PHB's email-fax phishing scam along with the > huge number of other variations on the theme need to be > mentioned? What is the approximate weight? 1 page? 10 pages? > 1000 pages? The DoD, I'm sure, pays good money for their > analyses and they probably expect them to be comprehensive.
Lets go and ask some bankers and the people at the Antiphishing Working Group. We can easily set up a con-call. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
