[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Callas
> I'm not trying to be twee when I phrase it this way. The reason I am > phrasing things this way is that mentioning words like "spam" and > "phishing" seems to be a sure-fire way to rathole a discussion about > DKIM. Absolutely, if DKIM is promoted as an anti-phishing solution it has to at minimum demonstrate that it will be a useful control against the threat of brand impersonation. If DKIM is promoted as an anti-spam solution there is the unfortunate precedents of ASRG and MARID (and no this is not an attack against you John, ASRG headed south a long time earlier). _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list <http://dkim.org>
