Keith Moore wrote:
So this is new to you; it's been discussed to death before --
and even on the MASS list.
This is a process issue. Understanding gained in the previous
discussion can inform the WG discussion but cannot preempt discussion
of this issue by the WG - and certainly cannot be used to justify a
technical flaw in DKIM. I bring it up now because it might relate to a
discussion about DKIM's charter.
This is where I get to suggest that you read the archives.
PS: as I said, take a look at l= and z= and their implications
for mailing lists.
IMHO, these are a useful start, but I think they need work. For
example, the MUST NOT prohibition against verifiers using the z= field
seems a bit overstated.
I agree, and it's completely unenforcable so it's rather
silly.
Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
