On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:12:33 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:33:11 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > > It shouldn't be an either-or choice. The author should be able to sign > > the message indicating that he wrote the content (so that a recipient can > > verify that yes, it really was written by who it says), and the list > > should be able to sign the message to indicate that the message was > > forwarded via the list (so that a recipient can verify that yes, the > > message really did come from the list). > > > This describes two different semantics for a DKIM signature. Where does the > current DKIM specification provide for such distinction in the semantics, so > that it can be reliably and accurately interpreted by a verifying agent?
Does this mean that you are proposing an enhancement to the DKIM goals (and, therefore, the specification) to provide a means for a signer to indicate their semantic "intent" or "meaning" in doing the signature? If yes, how? If no, then please clarify what you are proposing that changes DKIM. d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
