>> This describes two different semantics for a DKIM signature. Where does the >> current DKIM specification provide for such distinction in the semantics, so >> that it can be reliably and accurately interpreted by a verifying agent? > >I don't think it does. And I think this is a problem.
As always, I would appreciate a description of the problem that you believe that needs to be solved. Not "multiple message signatures", a problem that affects the way that people use their e-mail. After all, we've already agreed that the amount of list mail with forged originator addresses is extremely small, so that can't be it. R's, John _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
