On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Keith Moore wrote: > > I don't think DKIM should preclude MUA signing of authored content.
Agreed. > > However the submission server cannot trivially include the list of > > recipients in the message signature and remain compatible with BCC (which > > is one of our requirements). > > Sure it can. Any recipient in the envelope but not in the message header gets > a separate signature. Easiest thing to do is to sign outgoing traffic rather > than incoming traffic. This doesn't help for BCC recipients at the same domain. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
