So only include that token on the BCC copy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 5:11 PM > To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip > Cc: Tony Finch; Keith Moore; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] BCC Recipients > > > Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > Or something of that nature. That means that the BCC recipient can > > verify it was sent to them while preventing any To: or CC: > recipient > > knowing anything more than that there is a BCC. > > That in and of itself seems like a breach of BCC semantics. > I'd be very alarmed just knowing the existence of a Bcc > even if I didn't know who it was Bcc'd to. In many cases, > it would be very easy to guess to whom it was Bcc'd. > > Mike > >
_______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
