Thanks for your suggestions. I've made a note of them On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Douglas Otis wrote: > > This has been called a revocation-identifier in the past. It may be > described as a type of domain-cookie, or opaque-identifier. It would > permit a revocation mechanism and enable opportunistic identifications > that could even detect cross-domain forgery without any mailbox-address > constraints being applied.
Could you expand on this last sentence? I missed any description of it you may have posted already. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
