In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Miles Libbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As promised, Yahoo! posted the IPR statement for the IP contained > in the DKIM draft specification to the IETF site today. Thanks > [...] We are pursuing a dual licensing strategy. One license is > the GPL, I really appreciate the effort that Yahoo (and others?) have gone through for this. That said, isn't the GPL a copyright license, not a patent license? And, therefore, you really can't license your patent IPR under the GPL, right? Or, are you just saying that the patent license is GPL compatible? I guess the devil is in the details, and we shall see Real Soon Now. As long as the technology can by readily implemented by most major MTAs, both commercial and open-source, I don't much care. I think trying to stop domain-forging/spam/phishing is too important to get tied up by a bad license. -wayne _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
