Michael Thomas wrote:
The other part of this that I admit to being confused by is in what capacity Stephen is speaking -- bof chair, or just a contributor like any of the rest of us. The charter Barry sent out was discussed at length on the list and didn't seem especially contentious either on the list or at the Paris bof -- the main contention was the lack of a threats draft. Nor do I recall any pushback about the charter from our AD's (?). So I'm not sure what a wholesale rewrite at this point is actually attempting to accomplish. Are we really at risk of going off into the weeds at this point if we don't revisit every point of consensus we've accomplished in the last year or so?
My impression is that the charter was not well accepted in Paris. Either way though, I have pointed out specific problems that I see with it, some directly motivated by listening in Paris, and I've suggested some new text for discussion. In my role as Bof co-chair, I would not recommend the aug 22 draft if those items don't get addressed. The particular text I suggested however, is, as I've said, just offered for consideration and we'll end up wherever the consensus take us. So that's done as a conributer. Stephen. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
