Stephen Farrell wrote:
There's clearly confusion/disagreement on multi-signature semantics, and I can see why. While this is something that has to be cleared up, I hope I'm right in saying that its not so fundamental as to be a show-stopper in terms of getting a wg off the ground. For now, isn't it probably ok to add this to the to-do list and continue to work on the threat analysis which was a show-stopper last time?
Works for me. I think we have established that this is an interesting area for the WG to consider.
-Jim _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
