On October 14, 2005 at 12:08, Stephen Farrell wrote: > PS: Just so's I can reconstruct it for myself later, the construct > might end up something like: > body-hash = Hash1(nonce, body) > sig-bits = Private-key(Hash2(nonce,header-stuff, body-hash))
Actually the "data" hash would be more like: data-hash = Hash1(nonce, header-stuff, body) sig-bits = Private-key(Hash2(nonce, DKIM-Signature-field)) I.e. The digital signature is only on the DKIM-Signature field, nothing else. --ewh _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
