"John R Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Yes, and if there were a proposal for standardizing something that >> depended on solving World Hunger first, I would be skeptical of >> that too. > > Since the people I know involved with DKIM expect it to be plenty useful > without third party reputation services, I'm not sure what your point is.
Well, they may expect it to be, but I haven't heard any arguments along those lines that I find convincing. > Demanding reputation systems for DKIM is approximately like saying that > SMTP depends on solving the problem of getting mail into users' mailboxes. > Every SMTP server has to have a way to get the mail into the mailboxes, > but we've been getting by without a standard way to do it for 25 years and > SMTP seems to be usable anyway. I generally find arguments by analogy fairly unconvincing. This is one such argument. -Ekr _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
