>I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. The reason you >should consider these issues isn't that they're my opinion or that I >have some authority to make you do so, but rather that (IMHO) the >issues are worth considering. Since I explained the issues in a fair >amount of detail, I figure people can make their own assessment on >this point.
We did. This is a rehash of old arguments. The consensus has always been what I said, there's no reputation system that's anywhere near ready to standardize, and DKIM is plenty useful as is since we have specific useful applications in mind. > Either DKIM will do something useful or it won't, and that's > independent of the time when the question of its usefulness was > raised. Right. Could you explain why you aren't willing to consider the opinions of people who run rather large actual mail system when answering this question? (No, I don't mean me, although I also anticipate it being useful on my small 50K msg/day system.) R's, John _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
