Jeff Macdonald wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:02 +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
Douglas Otis wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mustang Sally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Introducing similar visual confusion for list-servers the following will
appear:
From: IETF-DKIM No-Reply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Douglas Otis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, this is valid 2822. I wonder what it breaks...
While it is valid, can anyone point to it being actually being used?
And can't the threats document (& later, whatever relevant spec) not
just say "don't do that" and thus avoid the problem?
If so, then we're back to "normal" eboy threats which are already
included in the analysis, right?
S.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
