In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jim Schaad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Additionally it will include the impact > of receiving domains that are not using DKIM (**** what is an example attack > or problem????****). I can think of several examples of where a *receiver* who doesn't use DKIM might be impacted by the sender using DKIM. For example, the DKIM headers are reasonably large and that might effect very low bandwidth connections (cell phones, remote locations, etc.) Some MUAs may barf on unknown headers, such as what DKIM creates. Some countries and/or organizations may look at the DKIM headers, see something that looks cryptographic and object to it. Ok, these are just examples that I can come up with off the top of my head. I think it is reasonable to consider more serious and/or realistic cases. Personally, I think the original wording in the charter is fine. -wayne _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
