On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 09:47 -0800, Douglas Otis wrote: > On Nov 18, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> > And the title of this thread is bogus. I may have missed explaining how a binding approach removes the eye- test. Consider binding information has been retained for important correspondents within a DKIM aware MUA. When subsequent messages arrive offering the same set of identifiers, (based upon binding assurances such as email-address, signing-domain, and perhaps opaque-identifier,) this message would be highlighted in some fashion. When a look-alike email arrives, it would not be highlighted. At that point, the user would be alerted and could then examine the identifiers using a fixed character-set to decide the disposition of the message, and whether the identifiers should be included within the profile for that entity. -Doug _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
