> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:04 AM > To: 'IETF DKIM WG' > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on the Threat Draft - > draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01 > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:14:48 -0800 "Jim Schaad" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Jim, > > > >I have some comments on this draft that I would like to make. > > > ... > >F. Potential Extensions to the base document (I would prefer > this to be > >labeled as appendix rather than section of the document for > clarity). > >This would include such things as SSP, reputation services > and other items. > > > It seems a bit odd to me to put part of the planned work of > the working group off in an appendix with other future work > that's outside the scope of the charter. > > I think all of the proposed work of the working group should > be addressed in a normative part of the document. > > Scott K
Scott, I want this document to focus on a single topic, the base document. From reading the list there seems to be a lot of arguments from different people about SSP that I just want to avoid right now and let them come up with respect to the SSP document rather than infecting the base and threat documents. Additionally there have been a large number of different types of extensions proposed by other people that could work. I would put them all together in dealing with the base document as potential future work for somebody --- where somebody could be this group. Jim > _______________________________________________ > ietf-dkim mailing list > http://dkim.org > > _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
