What is still pending on the document?
I guess there were at least a number of minor to middling issues raised on the list and in Vancouver. Things like having an abstract description of the signing process etc.
In the Threat Analysis discussions I have been struck by the difference in clarity and apparent consensus on the issues that pertain to the core functions, versus those that pertain to the "policy" functions.
[...]
All of this suggests that de-coupling the TA for the core functionality, from that of the policy-related enhancements, will be necessary if we are to stay on schedule.
I think that that may turn out to be the case, but I'd rather see the next revision and work from there. Cheers, Stephen. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
