> >> the specification" is way too high for that. > > Too high for what? Instead of arguing principles Eric, needs to > indicate what specific technical work that is excluded by this language > is actually essential to the goals of DKIM.
Dave, You keep making statements like that without a shred of support for your position. You seem to think that you alone dictate the conditions under which a working group should be chartered. You are mistaken, and IMHO your efforts are hindering progress of the the DKIM effort. Keith _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
