And if DKIM isn't an easy replacement for DK, it may never be deployed widely at all.
gosh, what an interesting point. one might almost think it would be good to restrict specification changes to those that are essential for dkim's success.
oops. unreasonable suggestion. all sorts of nasty (albeit ill-defined) implications.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
