Nick Nicholas wrote: >Jim makes some excellent points and raises several interesting avenues >of discussion which I would love to pursue. However, is the DKIM >mailing list the proper forum for doing so? It was my understanding >that the main item on the table at this time is finalizing the threats >document. Other venues where it might be better to discuss the topics >Jim raises could be the Anti-Spam Research Group's Identity, >Authentication and Reputation subgroup, or the "dia-blog" associated >with the Open Reputation System project. The former is quite moribund, >and John Levine is pleading for some activity there. The ORS dia-blog, >OTOH, is somewhat more active. > >Information about the ASRG IAR can be found at >http://asrg.sp.am/subgroups/iar.shtml. The ORS dia-blog is at >http://ors.blogs4change.org/. If you are interested in becoming a >designated "author" on the ORS dia-blog please let me know and I will >put you in touch with the person who can enable that for you. > > As I said in a later message that I sent only to the main IETF list and not to ietf-dkim, I also think ietf-dkim is the wrong place to discuss reputation protocols. Thanks for the pointers; I wasn't aware of ORS.
-Jim _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
