On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 22:48 +0000, Mark Delany wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:59:39PM -0000, John Levine allegedly wrote: > > > There are some sponsored TLDs that actually do enforce registration > > rules, but the largest of them .TRAVEL has only about 10K > > Another orth to this oganal might be registrars that enforce > registration rules. "Hi, I'm blah.biz and I've registered with the > you-can-find-me-to-sue-me registrar". > > Rather than try to impose one choice or another on ICANN/registrars, > why not make the choices available to domain owners and let them > choose between anonymized or sue-able?
Consider the dynamics that may be created by including reputations of the registrar in conjunction with the domain names. Registrars _may_ become more interested in improving their vetting practices, but criminal blitz attacks with even modest TTLs would be adequate for their activities. Even high ownership turn-over, where the registrar justifies termination based upon some use agreement, may still benefit the registrar, but then does little to curtail the problem. Require a CA certificate be used in conjunction with the domain to establish secure islands, rather off of a root? -Doug _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
