Michael Thomas wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote: > If a domain owner publishes an open policy, and if some "bad" > unsigned messages apparently emanate from that domain then the > domain owner's reputation may suffer. Why would any rational reputation system make such an assertion?
I dunno, I was paraphrasing. And that's why I also said: > I think that that's true, > but of course its already true today without DKIM or SSP. (Are reputation systems really rational - must get that Turing test dusted down so:-) S. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
