Stephen Farrell wrote: > *none* of the I-Ds listed on the tools page [1] are official > DKIM WG drafts.
Yes, they'd start with draft-ietf-dkim-*. Besides you'd know if you or Barry approved the -00 and appointed the editors. > the others remain, for now, as individual submissions (and > I'm not sure how exactly they got listed on [1]). "Tools" magic, the file names contain "-dkim-". It's in the subsection "related documents", all official drafts will show up in subsection "active" (or "expired") before "related". Bye _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
