----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Otis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Hector Santos wrote: >> >> Right, so there are 3 designs a LS can take when >> content modifications is desired by the list admin: >> >> - Strip, No Resign (NEUTRAL, WEAK) >> - Strip, Resign (NEUTRAL) >> - Resign (NEUTRAL, STRONG) > This appears this is using terminology that does not exist in the SSP > draft, and related to a dropped policy described here as (NEUTRAL, > WEAK), 'o=?'. I believe the consensus has preliminary accepted the easier to communicate terms in technical conversation, in fact, it appeared in the last IETF meeting PowerPoint presentations by Eric and Jim, I believe. WEAK was proposed by Arvel to be added to SSP. I don't think it was part of the original SSP draft. I haven't checked the latest drafts, so I don't know anything about it was added or "dropped policy." Are you making things up again? <g> -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
