Stephen Farrell wrote: > Looks much better to me +1
> though I had no problem with the original. That was a bit vague, Doug's proposal is IMO clearer. Bye _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
Stephen Farrell wrote: > Looks much better to me +1
> though I had no problem with the original. That was a bit vague, Doug's proposal is IMO clearer. Bye _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org