"Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So what you are saying is that YAHOO.COM has a "SSP" that says a > signature is required, STRONG or EXCLUSIVE? I haven't checked. Do they? > That would be a wonderful event in the annals of computing history! <g>
I do not think that Yahoo 'does' DKIM at all. They are using DK. In my naivety I thought that DKIM was supposed to be the next step and replacement for DK, so I wonder why Yahoo et al are still only using the older DK. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
