> > I'm increasingly getting the impression that we don't > > really understand the semantics of SSP.
> Here is the current proposed policies: ... > o=! EXCLUSIVE (signature required, no 3rd party) Well, OK. if a message has both a signature from the From: domain and one from someone else, does that pass? Why or why not? I'm not proposing we solve this here, just that we note that SSP is a can of worms that we must carefully keep out of the path of the basic signature work. Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor "I shook hands with Senators Dole and Inouye," said Tom, disarmingly. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
