> John, this would be all well and good except for the fact that even > though my name isn't on the draft I've had a great deal to do with > it from even pre-DKIM days. Hector's interpretation is wrong, and > that's not how it should be implemented.
I don't have any strong feelings about SSP other than that it's unlikely to be useful enough in anything like its current form to merit all the time people are putting into it. I'd really rather we put it on the shelf and concentrated on the core signature and verification. We all seem to agree that we need to improve the body canonicalization rules, but I don't see any work on that beyond my skeleton testing setup at http://forward.sp.am. Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, Mayor "I shook hands with Senators Dole and Inouye," said Tom, disarmingly. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
