Jim Fenton wrote: >> Example loopholes:
>> 1) A message is signed, but the SSP indicated a "o=." (No >> mail expected from domain). > There has been a lot of discussion of "o=." but it's not > actually in the current version of the SSP draft. Did you confuse this with WEAK ? Or do you have a fresher copy of the draft ? My copy draft-allman-dkim-ssp-01 still has o=. on <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allman-dkim-ssp-01#page-9> Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
