>If I do not publish any key records and a bad actor whips up an email >purported to be from me with a fake signature attached, a non dkim >compliant mta may have a rule that states "signed messages are probably >okay" that might bypass some spam checking software. Before DKIM is >fully adopted/deployed expect to see this happen,
How long did it take people to realize that the majority of mail that passes SPF is spam? R's, John _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
