Douglas Otis quoted:
> ,---
> | 1. Introduction
> | ...
> | Once the attesting party or parties have been established, the
> | recipient may evaluate the message in the context of additional
> | information such as locally-maintained whitelists, shared reputation
> | services, and/or third-party accreditation. The description of these
> | mechanisms is outside the scope of this effort. By applying a
> | signature, a good player enables a verifier to associate a positive
> | reputation with the message, in hopes that it will receive
> | preferential treatment by the recipient.
> '---
Thanks for pointing that out, it's wrong: A player, good, bad,
or ugly, enables a verifier to associate any kind of reputation
with the message, not only positive. DKIM will backfire and
hopefully educate some of the more ugly players. I like that.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
