On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:08:37PM +0000, Stephen Farrell allegedly wrote: > also valid. However, sha-1 has been *seriously* weakened: 2^63 is a ... > And regardless of whether hash-collision based attacks are actually ... > I'm not saying that the "MUST sha-256" argument is compelling, but
Can we seperate this discussion into another thread please? I was wanting to solely discuss mechanisms in this thread. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html
