On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 04:41:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly wrote: > "bad signature --> DKIM Failure, local policy will set procedure"
The complexity here, I think Bill, is that the discussion is about an email that has both a) a valid signature and b) at least one other header line that looks like it might have once been a valid signature. I think most here are saying that situation is out of scope and that the verified signature is all that the spec should deal with... for now. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html
