----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Delany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "IETF-DKIM" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:56 PM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language,for now
> And as long as the target doesn't forward or relay through a > non-interactive link. All the more reason why a passthru system should yield to traditional practice and not tamper with mail. :-) The client is targeting a MDA validator. It has no clue what happens in-between but if this capability logic is put into place, don't you think the forwarding/relay network would be up to par? -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
