> A validator MUST support {SHA-1, SHA-256}.
>
> A signer MUST support {SHA-1, SHA-26}. A signer SHOULD use {SHA-256} for
>its higher security strength. However a signer MAY use {SHA-1}, such as for
>compatibility with an installed base, lower computational cost, or easier
>implementation effort.
>
>
>Consensus?
Yes, with a note that if the IESG tells us they want something other
than SHA-256, that's fine.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
