On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 07:50:15AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: > ps. To the extent that folks decide we do need a special term for the first > Operator, the word Originator will be confusing, given a) it's history, and > b) it's likely intuitive meaning to folks. If you ask a random person who > the Originator of a message is, I suspect they will refer to the author.
That may be, but I'm with Bill on this one. As an ESP, the client is the author, we are just the publishers. However, if we just talking mail streams and not content, then I like your original model of Originator and Operator. -- :: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies :: e-Dialog | [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 :: www.e-dialog.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
