offlist.
and here i was, thinking it was klensin's way of making sure that i could not
continue to hassle his group's effort. (they are parition internet mail address
-- and therefore bisecting interoperability -- by creating an email addressing
partition, with no apparent sense of the impact or deep concern for dealing with
it.)
d/
Barry Leiba wrote:
I wish there were something that could be done about the conflict with
the eai Email Address Internationalization BOF.
yeah, that's a pretty impressive conflict to have set up.
For what it's worth, it's because those arranging the EAI BOF didn't put
DKIM as a conflict, probably at least partly because DKIM is in the
Security Area and not everyone who spends their time in the Apps Area
looks there.
When we scheduled DKIM, I put IEE -- the name EAI used in Vancouver --
as a conflict, but I had no idea that they would use a different name
now. And apparently Marcia wasn't able to resolve it afterward (DKIM
has a long list of conflicting WGs).
Barry
--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
