Oy vey! Urghhhhhhhhhh! Correction! I meant there is "no doubt" in my mind.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hector Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Current model: > > TCO(DKIM1) = TCO(HASH-BODY)+ TCO(HASH-HDR) + TCO(SSP) > > The order of the processing above is important. > > The more optimal model when considering order is: > > TCO(DKIM2) = TCO(SSP) + TCO(HASH-HDR) + TCO(HASH-BODY) > > There is [NO] doubt in my mind: > > TCO(DKIM2) <= TCO(DKIM1) > > The reasons are straight forward: > > - SSP processing offers short circuiting of remaining > processing overhead > > - HASH-HDR processing offers short circuiting of remaining > processing overhead > > and so on. -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
