Mark Delany wrote: > In summary, regardless of the merits or otherwise, of splitting the > base document, I would prefer that the base not-subsume the DKK RR and > presumably the Policy/Practice/Preference/Percolator RR or whatever it > will be called. > Agreed. Letting the design process of the DKK and DKP RRs go forward in parallel is a substantial benefit.
-Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
