Michael Thomas wrote: > How about: > > Signers SHOULD NOT use keys less that 1024 bits, receivers MUST > accept keys less that 1024 but MAY consider weaker keys as more > suspicious. > > (where "suspicious" has been used before in the draft to mean > something along the lines of heightened scrutiny, etc). "Suspicious" is currently only used in the SSP draft; its meaning in this context would need to be introduced here if it is to be used.
-Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
