Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 9:16 AM -0700 4/4/06, Michael Thomas wrote:
I have no idea why this merits even a SHOULD let alone a REQUIRED.
For interoperability. The current document says that it does not say
what multiple signatures mean, nor does it give a standard way for a
signer to attach multiple signatures to a message.
Do you consider this an adequate reply to all of the questions I asked?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
