At 10:59 PM +0100 4/4/06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
If no-one wants to insist on signatures having to be sequential,
then this could be fairly easy!
Signatures have to be sequential if you sign them, given our current
rules for signing and verifying h=. The question is whether or not we
care about the cases where multiple signed headers get reordered,
thus breaking the signature.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
