>Parsing and dealing with the value in x= is probably easier code than 
>doing the same with a date-stamp from a Received header.

I think we all agree that t= is useful to have an easily parsed version
of the time the message was signed.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to