> If by some miracle people actually rolled their keys over every > week -- as Mark is to be suggesting as the alternative to x= > -- then your use case would not work either.
Quite true. So what? > > To me the answer is obviously > > yes. How do you handle that with x= ? > > This is a false dilemma because you are requiring dkim to work in > situations that it was explicitly not intended to work for. Uh, what situations are those? If DKIM isn't useful for mail sent to humans with MUAs, why are we wasting our time? If your issue is that the time was a week, change the x= time to 15 minutes, the mail still lands in the recipient's mailbox in 10 seconds, and the user reads mail once an hour. Same problem. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
