Hector, I'd claim this is not a nit.
Eliot Hector Santos wrote: > Eric, > > In regards to the expiration tag x=, until a decision is made about its > fate, it is still part of the specs. In such a case, to comply with the x= > current specs, a preliminary step is missing in section 6.2: > > | 6.2 Get the Public Key > | > | ... > | > + 0. If signature has an expiration (x=) tag, check if the signature > + has expired. Signatures MUST NOT be considered valid if the > + current time at the verifier is past the expiration date. > + > | 1. Retrieve the public key as described in (Section 3.6) using the > | domain from the "d=" tag and the selector from the "s=" tag. > > -- > Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. > http://www.santronics.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
