And this is from a person who has a nasty habit of censoring and banning people from his so called anti-spam research areas. If you were ignoring me, and you know you don't, you wouldn't have read the message.
Ignore me if you want. I won't ignore you. The fact is, certified mail concepts raises the legal bar. You come to realized this yourself, finally. It is worth repeating: http://www.circleid.com/posts/california_frets_about_goodmail_email/ .... In the questions that followed we learned several interesting things. One is that AOL and Goodmail both agree that they are responsible for the mail they stamp, to the extent that if a phish or virus sneaks through with a stamp, they're on the hook for damages. This is something new in the world of e-mail. .... --- HLS ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x= > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >At 2:37 PM -0400 4/19/06, Hector Santos wrote: > > Try ignoring Hector. Just about everyone else does. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
